Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (116866)	11/11/2000 12:17:13 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

<Constitution I see, is Bush trying to claim the Presidency before the votes are counted. Has it occured to you how weird that is?> It is not so weird, if BOTH parties have seen the absentee ballots, that would explain why Gore is suing and Bush is beginning to prepare for the transition, just in case he is declared the winner. Personally, I am surprised by Bush's mature handling of the situation, and trust me on this one, I am not biased in favor of either candidate.

To: Scumbria who wrote (116866)	11/11/2000 12:22:36 AM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "The only violation of the Constitution I see, is Bush trying to claim the Presidency before the votes are counted" That's odd. A couple of posts ago you claimed Gore won the popular vote. How could he when the votes aren't all counted in California (1 million absentee votes still uncounted), Oregon and New Mexico? The voting isn't over when you want to bash Bush but it is over when you want to give the popular vote to Gore. You are consistently inconsistent. EP