SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (128159)11/11/2000 12:33:33 AM
From: stribe30  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570290
 
Scumbria: i am starting to think maybe Gore should concede after all (after all the recounts and absentee ballots are checked):

a) Bush is in a deadlocked Congress.. and with all the bitterness from this election, wont get any of his radical programs into place.. GridLock ensues. He gets blamed.

b) The economy is supposed to slow down and go south the next couple of years (if it isnt going already).. This is what cost Dubya's daddy his presidency in 1992 to Clinton... and it could cost Georgie Jr. All Gore has to do is sit tight.. and when the slump hits, point at the economy and then at Bush and say 'told you so' - putting him in great position for getting elected in 2004.

Swallow the pride and take the short term pain for the long term gain (of course.. if absentee ballots or recounts cause Bush to fall behind Gore.. then all bets are off) :)



To: Scumbria who wrote (128159)11/11/2000 1:49:21 AM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 1570290
 
<does not have the intellectual capacity>

How true and general observation. Just few minutes
ago on CNN some idiot argued that the 20,000 thrown
ballots are not so unusual because in 1996 election
there were also 15,000 bad ballots. It does not
cross their mind that it just proves the fact
that the ballots were and _are_ inherently flawed.
Talk now about "intellectual capacity" <ggg>

Regards,
- Ali



To: Scumbria who wrote (128159)11/11/2000 8:01:53 AM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 1570290
 
"I honestly believe that George W. Bush does not have the intellectual capacity to run the country. "

Actually he isn't as dumb as he may seem. He just doesn't have the patience for the details, and he prefers not to think too deeply. Besides, there is always the Reagan defense, "but his advisors are great!". Like it is a good thing not to have voted for the people actually making the decisions...

"If his last name wasn't Bush, the guy might be an insurance salesman,"

Well, if his last name wasn't Bush, he more than likely would have had a DD from the Air National Guard and a felony conviction on insider trading. But in todays job market, he might be able to do better than that.



To: Scumbria who wrote (128159)11/11/2000 8:07:17 AM
From: Joseph S. Lione  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570290
 
Scumbria - "I honestly believe that George W. Bush does not have the intellectual capacity to run the country."

The President does not run the country, he runs the executive branch of the federal government, nothing more.

Americans were told Harry Truman didn't have the heft to be President either, and he did o.k., no?

Joe