Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Oclaro, Inc. (Avanex-Bookham) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (878)	11/11/2000 11:12:06 AM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2293

Thanks (i think) for the post, Raymond. I really have no opinion on what the valuation of avnx "should be" but with all these shares coming loose, it may get smaller. Victor

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (878)	11/11/2000 2:39:47 PM
From: neverenough	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2293

it would be interesting to hear why Bong is pounding the table I wasn't! I was responding to a post that had no substance, to a post from somebody who has nothing better to do than bash a stock that could have a very promising future. Whats my agenda? I'm long this stock, and have been for some time. As I stated in my previous post, "AVNX is a very risky stock, but the pay-off potential is huge". How about you my little whore, what's your agenda? Oh don't tell me, your here to save all the lems from loosing their hard earned money. Thanks, but no thanks. We're all adults and capable of making our own decisions. All I can tell is that his hysterical attack of your sensible process is vulgar and suspect. Please point this out to me. When someone suggests that a company is a POS because insiders are selling, especially when those insiders are compensated with stock options, it's my opinion that they have an agenda to try to entice people to sell. Sure insiders are selling(I would too), but lets not forget the fact that institutions are buying. BTW, Do you even know who Simon Cao is? Do you understand what it would mean to the FO industry if Avanex can increase the number of wavelength bitstreams in a single fiber thread from the current commercial limit of 160 to the 1000 achieved in Avanex experiments, and then to an eventual level of hundreds of thousands? Theres my agenda, unless you have something of substance (either positive or negative REGARDING Avanex, other than insider selling) don't bother responding, because I have no desire to waste my time with BASHERS such as yourself.