SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: iandiareii who wrote (69904)11/11/2000 11:03:03 AM
From: coug  Respond to of 769670
 
Travis County, Texas registrar of voters on MSNBC edit,now refuting Baker comments about accuracy of hand recount..



To: iandiareii who wrote (69904)11/11/2000 11:15:31 AM
From: RON BL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Every year millions of American fill out a government form that has no arrows or punches on it. It is a form that confuses even the experts. It is a government created and mandated form that must be filled and filed by all. It is the tax form. Then my intent doesn't matter. Far more complex than a simple ballot with a few arrows.
If you make an honest mistake, tough shit !!! Those are the words of the IRS and thus the law. No media crying about your violation of civil rights and intent to honestly provide accurate information. If you make a mistake which is obviously unintended you will not only have to pay the money but you will pay additional fines.
Apparently Jesse Jackson or the media have no problem with penalties unfairly mandated by the IRS for their complicated form. Penalties are handed out even when the mistake was made at the advice of the IRS. The numbers of disenfranchised taxpayers far exceeds the minuscule 1% of the Florida disenfranchised voters.
Following this standard of logic perhaps those Florida "Oldsters" should be penalized for their errors and we should be debating the appropriate penalties.



To: iandiareii who wrote (69904)11/11/2000 11:21:55 AM
From: amadeus  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
no precedent for an injunction to block a hand count..

according an election law expert on cnn last night.
no one has ever tried to before...

hand counts are commonly done to verify accuracy
of results, as verified even by officials in the state of texas...

republicans are on thin ice here it seems.
I thought they wanted to keep it out of the courts?