Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (60875)	11/11/2000 7:44:23 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Scumbria, Dukakis should have been allowed to establish some basis for his death penalty beliefs prior to being asked that question. Half an hour later, I think it would have been a perfectly legitimate question, but it was clearly a political setup by Shaw. I don't remember when the question was asked; if you say it was the first question, okay. Before the debate, however, the Willy what's-his-name issue was already out, the limp noodle issue was out, and his strong stand on the death penalty had been out. I'm not sure what an extra half hour serving up lobs for him to hit would have accomplished. I do agree, however, that if you're going to slam a hard ball down the middle for one candidate you should do it for both; you don't serve up soft, easy lobs for the other candidate under those circumstances. What was the first question Shaw asked Bush? Dave