SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (116949)11/11/2000 11:49:44 AM
From: Gary Ng  Respond to of 186894
 
Jim, Re: I guess you didn't listen to Baker's explanation as to why they don't want/trust a handcount

Very weak. So there should be no election before the counting machine was invented ?

gary



To: Diamond Jim who wrote (116949)11/11/2000 12:23:53 PM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 186894
 
Jim, didn't you know that the dictionary is a fluid, dynamic thing, and new words are being created or spelling of old can be changed all the time by usage. In "Internet speak", loose for lose, and your for you're are gaining credibility by usage. :-)



To: Diamond Jim who wrote (116949)11/11/2000 12:25:10 PM
From: Windsock  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
DJ - "It seems that the last thing the Bush campaign wants is a full, fair and accurate vote count -- if Bush is going to loose."

With 2 people conducting the hand count, 1 D and 1 R, there is virtually no chance for error. You found my "loose" finger with no difficulty, even though the machine spellcheck missed it :-)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News