Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (60859)	11/11/2000 6:57:31 PM
From: Rarebird	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116758

<Where I do agree with Bush is that the Democrats can not expect an ENDLESS number of recounts UNTIL their predetermined result is obtained.> Bush's actions here in getting a court injunction to stop the recount in Palm Beach County is UNDEMOCRATIC. What is your boy afraid of? The fact that he may lose the Presidential election? All of these recounts have taken place in accordance with Florida law! Florida Law requires that a recount take place whenever the result is decided by less than 1/2 of a percent. The first recount took place purely in accordance with Florida Law. Gore had nothing to do with that. Under Florida State Law, Gore has every right to ask for a recount by hand. It is Bush who is running scared with his injunctions who is going against Florida State Law here.