Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (70017)	11/11/2000 1:13:33 PM
From: moby_dick	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

C'mon lallen - yesterday you were chiding the "sore loser Al" for taking this to court and now you flip and say it's OK if the Reps do it. You are beginning to sound like a freakin" politician. Both Gore and Bush's credibility are gone IMO - now your's is waning as well in my book.

To: jlallen who wrote (70017)	11/11/2000 2:08:10 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Of course you thought Baker made an excellent statement. You are for Bush aren't you? But the real question is are you for the will of the people? There is much greater downside to cutting short a full accounting. Bush's nervous calls to stop any inquiry has a devastating effect on his credibility to lead. He looks like a man that is looking over his shoulder and seeing he is losing ground. His television appearance was disturbing to say the least. He referred to his wife as First Lady Bush - rather bad form. He was unable to explain the reason he gave the go ahead for filing the injunction in Federal Court. He had to defer all questions to Jim Baker? Who is in charge? Who made this decision? Who is responsible? Does Bush make decisions that he is incapable of explaining? I can't recall hearing a President not understand a decision he has made or to not be able to explain it. I found that appalling.