SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GraceZ who wrote (36457)11/11/2000 2:12:35 PM
From: re3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
<<<Maybe this simple fact is too contrary to your hope for the worldwide financial collapse, you know the one needed to make those mining stocks worth something.

gold is up in other currencies you know...

<<<Anyone could see two years ago that the percentage growth of their stock prices was higher than the growth of their revenues/earnings

anyone could see ? i think practically 'anyone' chooses not to look or has no patience for such calculations...

<<<There is always something to buy, the same way there is always something to sell.

i'm down on my golds, and silvers, but then, i'm less down than the athome diehards are with their beloved...weren't you one of those diehards on athome ?



To: GraceZ who wrote (36457)11/11/2000 5:39:54 PM
From: Oblomov  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
>>I'd venture to say that a drop to 2600 and a selling climax would be extremely bullish

From a technical standpoint, it might be bullish in the short term. But what if there is no selling climax?

In any case, the trend and the fundamentals still point downtown...



To: GraceZ who wrote (36457)11/11/2000 10:22:24 PM
From: Monty Lenard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Meanwhile companies with much higher growth rates are emerging to take their place.

Got a list handy? :-)

Monty