Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bigsablepoint who wrote (70092)	11/11/2000 2:04:53 PM
From: TH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

BS Point. There is no point to this. You have your views and I have mine. Just try to get into the others shoes on this one point. JUST THIS ONE POINT. You cannot pick and choose where you are going to do these recounts. You have to accept that the machine makes mistakes everywhere and that the law of averages will equalize it in the end. The count was done, and then it was done again, and now it will be done by hand. How many times do we have to do it? And why not do it a few times in those areas where Bush is the heavy favorite. First once, then again, and then by hand. Keep repeating until Bush has equalized any gains that Gore was able to squeeze from the process. It will never end. I fear no outcome, except one that does not reflect the designed outcome of the process. Gore lost, and he cannot accept it, so his selfish interests let him compromise the national interest. And most important, the true nature of Al Gore is seen. Do you talk to any Democrats outside this thread? I have and they are not too pleased with this. Polls? Lol. I don't have time to address that. If you believe that polls are for something more than entertainment or the advancement of a single groups position then I have land to sell you. Please pm me and we can arrange terms. Agree, that I wish Bush had not done this. Again that is a response that is really not addressing the intent of my question. On the other side, I can see how Bush is trying to stop a process that Gore started. It is a reaction, but I do think that Bush would have been better served by doing nothing. TH