SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (70227)11/11/2000 3:27:15 PM
From: pezz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
<<And what assurances do we have that Gore won't cave in to Big Labor, the NEA, Envirowhackos, etc. >>

His is an Envirowhacko himself....That's why I voted for him!



To: jlallen who wrote (70227)11/11/2000 3:33:41 PM
From: Mr. Whist  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
I agree with much of what you had to say in #70228. Scary, isn't it?

I think with Gore, he's more of a proven commodity ... with the possible exception of environmental issues. The country didn't cave in to Big Labor, the NEA, environmentalists during the Clinton years, correct? We generally know where Gore stands on such issues, because he has an 8-year track record as VP. Bush? Who knows. I doubt if even you know where exactly he stands on abortion. Or rights of workers. Or workplace safety standards. I don't.

Regarding the religious right: Reagan and Bush Sr. would have won without the religious right. Not so with Bush Jr. Dubya has some debts to pay to the Bob Joneses and Jerry Falwells of the country, for the religious right's help in both the primary and general election.

Also, I think it's interesting that on Wednesday this week, cigarette stocks all enjoyed a price rise because of the perception of a Bush win.

I agree with your analysis of guns vs. "choice." You would have no problem with stricter gun laws, and I would have no problem with banning late-term abortions except in special cases.