Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TraderGreg who wrote (1833)	11/11/2000 4:39:03 PM
From: Triffin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

Turn on MSNBC .. Here are the folks that are going to decide the next President .. Holding ballots up to the light and scratching their heads .. Jim in CT .. @is-that-a-valid-vote?.com

To: TraderGreg who wrote (1833)	11/11/2000 4:43:59 PM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

Warren Christopher is giving the DEMS side of the story, how a hand count IS justified as a means of getting the most ACCURATE count in a vote. Secy. Christopher cited examples of legislation in states where legislatures have formally authorized hand counts as the definitive method of counting votes in close contests and certainly FL affords that option. In fact, Secy. Christopher mentioned one of those states where the Governor recently signed that legislation. The Governor put his own John Hancock on the bill to authorize hand counting...George W. Bush, Governor of the State of Texas This is beyond ROFLMAO...this is better than that 14th amendment excuse TG