SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greg from Edmonton who wrote (11467)11/11/2000 5:28:46 PM
From: NickSE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14778
 
Here's a relatively new motherboard w/ onboard raid that's been getting a bit of press lately.

ABIT KT7-RAID Socket-A
anandtech.com

Regarding the GXPs, I luv 'em. They're super quiet and transfer around 90MB/s, whereas if I connected them directly to my motherboard (Asus P3V4X), would only transfer a maximum of 66MB/s.

IBM Deskstar 75 GXP Hard Drive
www6.tomshardware.com

ATA/100 RAID Controllers Roundup
ixbt-labs.com



To: Greg from Edmonton who wrote (11467)11/11/2000 6:11:09 PM
From: Zeuspaul  Respond to of 14778
 
Backing up failing harddrives can be risky. On two occasions I have backed up harddrives after noting signs of failure. I used Drive Image but Ghost is a similar program.

On both occasions I was unable to retrieve/restore data. Copying a corrupt file into a complete backup runs the risk of relegating additional files unusable.

Drive Image and Ghost are good for complete system backups. I suggest copying all necessary *data* files using a standard copy command i.e. keeping them in their original unique uncompressed format.

RAID protects against physical harddrive failure real time. Don't rely on it to protect your data. A virus or other gets written to both drives at the same time. Power surges destroy both drives at the same time.

If you want to protect data files set up an automated backup system that writes to removable media.

Zeuspaul