SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MasonS who wrote (14719)11/11/2000 7:34:36 PM
From: Dealer  Respond to of 65232
 
Hi Mason!

I just heard on TV that the Bush org. had asked for a recount by machine by Palm Beach County. Now that was pretty smart on their part. They keep saying it is more accurate.......Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

That will 3 to 1 for Bush. Three more reliable machine accounts and if Gore wins by the unreliable personally influenced recount. Sooooooooooooooo!!

Interesting!!! I had not known who requested the extra machine count which they are just completing as I type.....did not hear the figures yet.

dealie



To: MasonS who wrote (14719)11/11/2000 7:38:20 PM
From: CAtechTrader  Respond to of 65232
 
No reason to believe November 7, 2000 could not be stamped by hand on ballots mailed from Israel. Certainly the Israelis have to see electing Gore in their self interest and Israel never refrains from acting in its own self interest.



To: MasonS who wrote (14719)11/11/2000 7:41:09 PM
From: Selectric II  Respond to of 65232
 
You are prescient. I won't be surprised if the Israel absentees will be record-breaking, despite the fact that it should have been extraordinarily "ho-hum," if not slightly more in favor of Bush for a number of reasons, including Clinton pandering to Arafat, plus Gore's secret arms deal with the Russians. Someone should put Janet Reno on the case immediately <groan>.