Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary Ng who wrote (117164)	11/12/2000 4:00:29 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE: "You are telling half of the story." Actually, only 1/67th of the story since there are 67 voting regions. RE: "I can bet you that those mentioned problematic votes(chad stuff) appear through out the states which means there will be votes meant for Bush discovered too." I wonder how long a hand count of the entire state would take? Aren't these poll workers volunteers (thus, free labor), so if the financial costs aren't too high, why not just do a hand count of New Mexico, Wisc, and Florida, and then be done with it. Regards, Amy J

To: Gary Ng who wrote (117164)	11/12/2000 1:56:16 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:". This is very much in line with the distribution of that county.: Actually, the precincts picked by Gore to have the recount were probably more like 90-10 Gore. So if you found say 35 more votes, 31 would be gore, 4 Bush...net 27 Gore...see how that works? Over all, Palm Beach county was 62-35 Gore. I would expect that ratio to hold over the whole recount. If the find say 3000 new votes (by human interpretation) that 1860 Gore and 1050 Bush, net 810 Gore. Same with the ratios in Broward and Dade which also went for Gore... If they allow only handcounts in these counties...Gore will win the state...even if the remaining absentee ballots are heavily Bush, IMHO... Jim