Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TraderGreg who wrote (1916)	11/11/2000 9:51:57 PM
From: Windsock	Respond to of 6710

Re: "Why oh why is the Grand Old Party so against to the lawfully allowed manual recount?" Because they only want a count that allows them to win. They don't care about anything. The Bush loyalists want the same thing, a win at any costs. So logic is thrown out and double standards are deployed. They are so irrational that they either don't care or can't see that everyone knows they are fools.

To: TraderGreg who wrote (1916)	11/11/2000 9:59:16 PM
From: Carolyn	Respond to of 6710

Dear TraderGreg - Windsock said it perfectly.

To: TraderGreg who wrote (1916)	11/11/2000 11:11:35 PM
From: Kevin McKenzie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

Why oh why is the Grand Old Party so against to the lawfully allowed manual recount? I don't think anyone on this thread can legitimately speak on behalf of the "Grand Old Party". I don't begrudge the Democrats a manual recount, as allowed by law. I am a little confused as to why the Florida Elections Commission can pick and choose when to follow the letter of the law (as when requiring the manual recount), and when to abandon the current law in favor of a previous, invalid version (as in how to conduct the manual recount). It's my guess that nearly every precinct in the entire Country will have a certain percentage of invalid ballots. So in a vote separated by somewhere between 300 and 1,700 votes, it is a mathematical certainty that if you re-incorporate 19,000 invalid ballots from only one of 67 counties, and that particular county happens to heavily favor one candidate, that candidate is almost guaranteed to gain more than 1,700 votes. I've read through most of the posts made on this thread in the last few days, and it is painfully obvious that each of us sees what we want to see to bolster our opinion. Nothing I say can convince you that the Republicans have taken the much more dignified and reasonable actions in this fiasco. Nothing you say will convince me that the Democratics are merely trying to get at the truth as expressed by the Will of the People.