Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Windsock who wrote (117235)	11/11/2000 11:44:41 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Windy, RE:"If you would just admit that you want Bush to win at any cost no matter the Rules, now that would be honest and logical." Not true, you must be talking about Scumbria...LOL

To: Windsock who wrote (117235)	11/12/2000 12:07:25 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Too bad that you didn't take a course in logic so you could understand the errors of your arguments Is this statement from one of your posts an example of your brilliant reasoning? "The R's don't want an accurate count if it means that Gore loses." Then you made some twisted statement that you said Bush said. I asked you for backup and you posted twice with two urls that had nothing to do with the quote. Did you expect that we would just accept the statement as true without reading the URL? Half truths and misrepresentation waste our time and if done by campaign candidates are dangerous to our system of government. Then you came up with some waco theory that the ballot was illegal because the names weren't in order. What are you, four years old?