Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (55)	11/12/2000 11:17:01 AM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3887

you know the one with no brain I guess getting a Harvard MBA is brainless work after all. Thanks for enlightening me......LOL

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (55)	11/16/2000 7:41:41 PM
From: FlatTaxMan	Respond to of 3887

PRESS RELEASE FROM KYLE FIELD College Station, TX (APee) - R.C. Slocum and the Texas A&M Aggies are demanding a recount of the game in which Oklahoma won 35 to 31. "The end zones were confusing," says Slocum. "I'm sure that some of the touchdowns that went in Oklahoma's end zone were meant to go into ours. We were scoring in those end zones also. Oklahoma would never have scored thirty-five points. There's no way we lost this one. A&M demands a recount." Oklahoma officials are calling this "outrageous". "They agreed to the size, shape and locations of the end zones prior to kick-off," replies OU coach Bob Stoops. "If they had a problem with them, they should have said so before we started. You don't get to keep playing until you're happy with the outcome. Someone had to lose. We've scored over thirty-five points many times." A&M has sent lawyers, farmers, and those guys in the funny boots as well as that dang dog down to Kyle Field, where the scoreboard will be tested. "We are confident that when the points are re-totaled, we will be the winner of the game," says Slocum. OU also points out that in many games prior to this one, the same end zones were used. "They didn't have a problem with the end zones until they lost," says Stoops. Outside of Kyle Field, A&M student protesters have gathered outside bearing signs such as, "A&M wants a fair game! WHOOOOOOP!" Students'thoughts echoed their signs. "All we want is a fair total of the points before we declare a winner," says student Karen Hays, an Aggie from Marfa. "We need to proceed cautiously and not rush to judgment before we declare a winner." ABC, around 2:00pm central time, had mistakenly projected A&M the winner, despite the slim 3 point lead the Aggies held at that point. At about 2:30 pm, with the game still too close to call, ABC had to back off its prediction. College Football analyst Brent Musburger made the call. "We felt that with a number of points still not added in by Jamaar Tombs and the Aggies, we were certain A&M would carry this game. We may have been premature in our prediction."