Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (71338)	11/12/2000 1:59:55 PM
From: Sea Otter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Exactly right! Finally someone posts the facts! Gore is following Florida law. That's a fact. Bush is trying to overturn Florida law. That's another fact. The only way for this to end is for the process to run its course and the tallies be announced by Florida. That's a final fact.

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (71338)	11/12/2000 2:00:32 PM
From: HighTech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Interesting. I have heard the dems and others say that the suit by Bush doesn't have much of a chance for serious consideration, that the Feds won't touch it. Do you see it that way? HiTech

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (71338)	11/12/2000 2:13:02 PM
From: Mr. Palau	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I've looked again, and still cant find the Machine Count Clause in the Constitution. Under the Robert Bork original intent of the framers approach to the constitution, only hand counts should be allowed in any event. Anyone else out there think that it's a tad ironic that the federalist, strict constructionist GW has run to federal court using the federal civil rights statutes to bail himself out? Why did he sign that unconstitutional Texas law preferring hand recounts over machine recounts?