Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (60976)	11/12/2000 3:45:26 PM
From: multicollinearity	Respond to of 93625

A manipulation of loosely interpreted rules with the objective of achieving a predetermined outcome, with a total disregard for the issue of fairness. Also, please respond to my earlier PM.

To: Scumbria who wrote (60976)	11/12/2000 4:05:20 PM
From: richard surckla	Respond to of 93625

Scumbria... "Are you suggesting that the Bush campaign could not have asked for recounts of their own?" Why would Bush ask for a recount when the Democratic Election Officials had told him that he was the winner? They then changed there mind and said that a recount was in order. That recount was supposed to be the end of it. Bush also won on the recount. Now the Democratic officials said that winning the recount was not enough. They went to a Democratic judge, a supporter and contributor to Gore and asked for a third recount, but to be made manually. The judge's husband was also appointed to a Democratic position by Clinton. The were no rules or guidelines in place for the manual recount. Guidelines were established by the Democratic officials and then changed 1/3 the way through the manual recount. The Democrats are engaged in what I would term as an open public fraud against the citizens of the U.S.A.