Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (128322)	11/12/2000 4:39:01 PM
From: stribe30	Respond to of 1570070

Jim said: I have some suspicions. PB County had the largest net gain for Gore in the recount. Jim, the Republicans -which I presume you are - have always claimed that "the people should be trusted" and that local officials should have power invested in them, and t he federal government should be divesting power to them and stay out of municipal affairs. Yet.. here we have the local officials doing exactly that, and now its the Bush candidacy trying to go into federal court to squash a local initative. Interesting how their principals vanished when it involves wanting power.

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (128322)	11/12/2000 9:02:23 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570070

I have some suspicions. PB County had the largest net gain for Gore in the recount. Far more than the average. Palm Beach county is a heavy Gore county. 62-35 Gore. Palm Beach county is a whiney county... Very interesting the change for Gore... Jim, Oh, bull....you are milking this for all its worth....talk about whinny. There are US. Marshalls, state officials and about 50 witnessing the recount. Toobad they were present during the first count Tuesday nite. ted