Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Palau who wrote (71558)	11/12/2000 4:17:50 PM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Come on! FLORIDA LAW SAYS IT. NO ONE PERSON DID. I would remind you that it is the same Florida law that is allowing Gore to subjectively interpret voided votes in his favor by his surrogates. I would argue that they're interpreting the law to allow that, and perhaps a different interpretation would not allow it. The Palm Beach Co. press conference last night (I watched it live) was ridiculous. I have never seen such a travesty unfold on live television. LoF

To: Mr. Palau who wrote (71558)	11/12/2000 4:24:55 PM
From: Ga Bard	Respond to of 769667

Well if you try to audit or investigate the obvious voter fraud the DEMOcrats will merely attempt to shut down the nation as they did once before in 1997 ... Here is a prime example of DEMOcrats threatening to shut down the Senate to stop a voter fraud investigation in Louisiana in 1997? Four years after they voted in a law to set the precedence for voter fraud (Motor Voter Act of 1993! Louisiana / July 23, 1997 / Sen. Tom Daschle threatened to allow "only on critical funding, tax and budget bills," to be considered by the Senate and would "stop all other legislation and Senate committee hearings if the Republicans don't halt the Louisiana probe." reagan.com --------------------------------------------------------------- Think about this. Why are the DEMOcrats so against voter fraud being exposed. Could it be they are mostly behind it? :-) Gary