Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (15124)	11/12/2000 10:22:55 PM
From: RocketMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

f WPBch alone tips balance, then DUE PROCESS kicks in It depends on what "vote" means.

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (15124)	11/13/2000 8:48:35 AM
From: im a survivor	Respond to of 65232

<<Rocky, if WPBch alone tips balance, then DUE PROCESS kicks in Federal Courts are adamant, persistent, and universal in enforcement of due process the feds will be reluctant to step in but they will step in on such an uneven ballot criterion that is my prediction, and I love to make them a few recently have been wrong you cannot have one deeper handcount criterion apply to one county, and another more shallow machine count criterion apply to every other county (except maybe Volusia with Daytona) >> I agree....even a Democratic Judge must look at things fairly. How could he put Gore in office when discrepancies abounded everywhere, not just PB..... A judge must do this in a fair manner, or the people will be heard. I say, recount or revote the whole damned state and end this. It makes no sense to count one county and not count them all...even a third grader could see the impartial nature of this. Keith