Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (117451)	11/12/2000 9:28:31 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, re: Watergate was about a US President subverting a US Presidential election. How much worse can it get? So far there isn't any conclusive evidence of that happening here. Every Presidential candidate has "subverted" every election, it's just a matter of degree. They do/say whatever is required to get elected. But the transfer of power has always been graciously accepted by both parties, until now. The rule of law is what separates this country from other, less stable countries. It's at the center of our strength. We are not there yet, but we are headed in a very bad direction. John

To: Scumbria who wrote (117451)	11/12/2000 9:38:37 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"Watergate was about a US President subverting a US Presidential election" This is not accurate and you know it. A complete retraction and apology to Nixon (what the heck) and the board is in order. For Nixon, Watergate was about lying about the coverup. Never was proven Nixon knew anything about the Watergate break-in before it happen or had anything to do with it. Nixon had the decency to resign...Clinton lied under oath and did not resign even after being impeached in the house and got away with it. A lot has changed in 28 years... Jim