SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (117464)11/12/2000 9:55:44 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 186894
 
Re: [to Scumbria]"No, I think you are missing the point. A state wide hand count should be done REGARDLESS of what either party wants. <b.If the thrown out ballots are randomly distributed, only then will you get a fair result since only then will you be looking at all the thrown out ballots from an essentially equal (for each side) number of valid ballots. If you don't see this, then I will indeed assume you may well be somewhat stoopid."

I have been making this exact point but it seems to go in one ear and out the[his] other. This is obvious to anyone with a statistical background. If he doesn't get it then your assumption may well be correct.

EP



To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (117464)11/12/2000 9:59:34 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Watson,

Perhaps a state wide hand count would be the logical remedy, but Florida law seems to have no such provision.

Scumbria