Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (61047)	11/12/2000 10:55:19 PM
From: multicollinearity	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

<Why didn't Nixon turn Liddy in? Why didn't Liddy talk?> Scumbria: I don't accept your premise that one had something on the other, but for the sake of argument, let's assume they did. Then I think a plausible answer to your question is LOYALTY. You have to remember Liddy's background; loyalty was in his blood. The same, I believe, could be said of Nixon. Don't get me wrong. I did not defend Nixon's actions, and I argued for his removal at the time. I am just disagreeing with your recollection of the events and the giant inferences you are making concerning them Multico Multico

To: Scumbria who wrote (61047)	11/13/2000 12:24:45 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Scumbria, Why didn't Nixon turn Liddy in? Why didn't Liddy talk? Why didn't Susan McDougal talk? Before you answer, if it's that there was nothing to say, maybe you have the answer to your own question. Of course, her husband was apparently about to say something just before he had his heart attack. Conspiracies? Nah, I don't believe in them either.<G> Dave p.s. I have no particular regard for Nixon (in fact, the opposite). Just trying to show that people in glass houses may want to watch where they're chucking those stones.