Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (5819)	11/13/2000 2:07:37 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10042

Dude, I'll say it again here. If you are interested if a fair vote count, you must recognize that in an election of this import, you CAN'T be fair and use a hand-count recovery of machine rejected ballots in only partisan counties. Don't you agree? If it's clear that Bush couldn't catch up by hand-counting the rest of the counties, he should concede. But anything less than a fair application of vote counting methods across the state would not cut the mustard in determining who should concede. To be fair, you either use the machine count Bush wants, the full state hand-count, or, a re-vote of some sort based on the butterfly issues. What's this whoey about being afraid of limits on free speech? There ARE limits and they are just fine, thank-you. You know, fire in a crowded theater and all? Don't tell me you expect anyone reading you to fear Bush would take away free speech, not with a straight face! Dan B