Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (117552)	11/13/2000 10:14:21 AM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 186894

I just couldn't pass up some of these bargains this morning so I grabbed some QQQs @ $70. EP

To: steve harris who wrote (117552)	11/13/2000 2:38:17 PM
From: Amy J	Respond to of 186894

OT re:"Funny how I was your "target" instead of the target being the message. --------------------- Your question was the "target" of my answer. And to remind you, your question was: --------------------------------------------------- To: Jim McMannis who wrote (117168) From: steve harris Sunday, Nov 12, 2000 9:31 AM ET Reply # of 117596 Jim, I woke up this morning expecting to see you "pulverized" by the liberal's polished rhetoric. I'm not surprised you're still standing. Why is that I wonder? steve -------------------------------------------------- To remind you, my answer was: --------------------------------------------------- To: steve harris who wrote (117312) From: Amy J Monday, Nov 13, 2000 12:58 AM ET Reply # of 117593 RE: "Why is that I wonder?" Because he avoided the debate. ... Amy J -------------------------------------------------- And: --------------------------------------------------- To: Jim McMannis who wrote (117522) From: Amy J Monday, Nov 13, 2000 1:23 AM ET Reply # of 117599 The ball was in your court to answer/debate a couple of posts that you ignored. ... Amy J ---------------------------------------------------- To: Amy J who wrote (117526) From: Jim McMannis Nov 13, 2000 1:27 AM Respond to Post # 117528 of 117597 ... I don't have the time to debate the issue right now. Jim ----------------------------------------------------- Steve, so, this (the above) was the answer to your question. --------------------------------------------------- Steve, RE: "(my comment) because he avoided the debate." RE: (your comment) "I avoided responding to your message because" Btw, "he" was "Jim", not you. You misread the post. RE: "Affirmative action IS NOT equal rights." Huh? Jim and I were not discussing this. We were discussing "startups". You misread our posts. Amy J