SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (18804)11/13/2000 1:52:27 PM
From: TenchusatsuRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Petz, <if large cache processors are such a hot ticket, how come Intel is stuck at 700 MHz -- and sells many more 800, 900 and 1000 MHz Xeons with 256K cache?>

Hmmm, you got me there. Cascades is targeted toward 4-way and 8-way SMP servers. That market is much more conservative than the 2-way SMP market, which is why Intel is more aggressive with speed grades on non-Cascades Xeon.

Still, Intel was having trouble meeting demand for Cascades even at 700 MHz. Most likely this was due to manufacturing capacity (making one Cascades means sacrificing four or five potential Coppermines). Likewise, AMD probably decided that Mustang would severely impact production of everything else, so they dropped it and are now pinning their hopes of 2-way SMP penetration with small-cache Palomino.

Tenchusatsu



To: Petz who wrote (18804)11/13/2000 4:10:43 PM
From: milo_moraiRespond to of 275872
 
LMAO!!! Thanx!(eom)



To: Petz who wrote (18804)11/13/2000 4:18:32 PM
From: Tony ViolaRespond to of 275872
 
John, if large cache processors are such a hot ticket, how come Intel is stuck at 700 MHz -- and sells many more 800, 900 and 1000 MHz Xeons with 256K cache?

Speed/power tradeoff, been around for years.

Don't sell the 700/1 - 2Meg short. Every one sold usually ends up with 3 to 7 more because they all go in 4-way or 8-way servers. 900 MHz EOY or Q1.

TV