Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (49272)	11/13/2000 12:58:33 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

<< I liked Reagen from the very beginning >> And a great many people did not. There was a significant number that regarded him as a bad actor with little other ability. << Reagen knew his limitation and left the job to others, and that is why he was so succesfull IMHO. >> And in fact running the US government is always a process involving many people. That's both good and bad. It's slow and cumbersome. It also prevents radically wrong decisions. << My argument is about intellectual capabilities >> He would hardly be the first President whose dog was smarter than he. Reagan, your hero, was certainly no intellectual giant. Many have been midgets, but they are surrounded by people who are knowledgeable and intelligent. Frankly, I don't see disaster regardless of who wins. Gore just might be better because that restores gridlock.