Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Things That Amuse Me -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nittany Lion who wrote (664)	11/13/2000 1:33:35 PM
From: mr.mark	Respond to of 12669

we all know that if there was any logistical problems with collection, our better half would be happy to receive the funds

To: Nittany Lion who wrote (664)	11/13/2000 4:37:36 PM
From: mr.mark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12669

i've been noticing that whenever these political types (be they candidates or campaign managers) use the word obviously, the facts are quite the opposite. i used to work with a gal who would fall back on the use of that term whenever she felt she needed to strengthen her argument. the minute i heard her start throwing the word obviously around, it was like a red flag had just popped up. and i knew instantly that she knew her position was weak and in need of help. obviously in need of help. yep, obviously is a clear cut case of the speaker underlining for us that part of his or her speech that is less credible, or in doubt. no different, really, than listening to a salesman yapping away and pretty soon you hear the infamous words, well to tell you the truth. that salesman is underlining the lie for us! it's perfect. one time i found myself in one of these incredible conversations, and directly the other party said to me, "can i be honest with you?". and i said, "heck no, why change on me now!" obviously i was having too much fun :) mark