Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (72891)	11/13/2000 2:55:26 PM
From: microhoogle!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

That incident did not qualify for provisions (if there were any). I am sure the present situation also qualifies as an exception in that case.

To: Neocon who wrote (72891)	11/13/2000 3:41:53 PM
From: iandiareii	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

There are no explicit provisions made for extending the soft deadline in case of a recount -- this is precisely her justification for preferring the shall of the first section to the may of the se cond. She recognizes that the statute allows her discretion ( see hurricane ref.) but says not in this case. Her argument is that (a)had the legislature wanted to make specific exception for recounts it would have done so since (b) the legislature made specific certain other matters concerning a recount. Typing on the fly. Please excuse any spelling/grammar goofs. I see her argument, but I don't find it persuasive. Off I go.