Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (61125)	11/13/2000 8:10:07 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Respond to of 93625

Misheldo, it is so easy for people to call it "the law", the law is that it is at the discretion of the secretary to extend the deadline (there are two paragraph, one says "shall" the other says "may", meaning it may not at its (or her) discretion. A court can always overturn this 'discretion" if it feels the public is better served with full counting. Furthermore, that "laws" is in contradiction with the laws that call for "manual" counting , if such counting cannot be carried out within th time prescribed. First, there is no reason for tomorrow when there are still a bunch of ballots from oversea to be counted by the 17th, second, nothing will happen if the certification is completed by December the 18th. By the way, you can protest and let your view be known via e-mail here: fairelection2000.org Zeev