SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (7786)11/14/2000 6:27:00 AM
From: JDN  Respond to of 30051
 
Dear Zeev Hed: The Republicans did not request any hand counts anywhere in Fla. Seminole county is heavier Democrat registered anyway. I think the pickup there came from finding uncounted ballots. What I dont like about this is the SELECTIVE handcounting of CERTAIN counties. IMHO machine counting is not subjective and although it makes errors, statistically on a large population the errors should be equal to each side. When you pull out only CERTAIN counties you skew the results, I cant see how people could find that fair. JDN



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (7786)11/14/2000 10:54:56 AM
From: SBHX  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 30051
 
OT:Zeev,

If machine count cannot be trusted, why should human hand counting be trusted? You'd think that machines are basically impartial, and if there were flaws, the flaws should apply to everyone.

If counting by human hands are now required, whose hands will do the counting? Since so much is at stake, are the humans doing the counting allowed to hold political preferences?

SbH


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News