Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cactus Jack who wrote (15755)	11/14/2000 12:10:11 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

That was not about the election..... maybe someone wants to bring more traffic to the 'scene of the accident'...... Perhaps Poet wants to dance a jig in front of, "a rather large group of SI members who regard what has been happening on this thread <<the porch>> with a growing sense of concern, and yet have not been willing to speak up." Consider the following was also said in that post by Poet..... >>"Second, I've noticed how critical comments about some of the investment decisions here have been met with a wall of negativity and now, outright banning. "<< I was not aware that personal attacks was an investment option. If so, please pont me to where as I'd like to short it & buy puts too...... What a pile of stinky poo poo IMVHO. >>"Frankly, like a motorist passing by an accident, I've slowed down but driven past. "<< I beg to differ... all things considered, what Poet did was more like a drive by shooting IMO. Yet in another post by Poet regarding her little foray here.......... >>"I've got to say I agree, bb. I just made the following post on Voltaire's Porch and I'm hoping I don't get tarred and feathered for it, but I'm worried: Message 14801639 "" Message 14801688 In yet another Poet post..... >>"You mistake concern for hauteur and that's to your detriment."<< Perhaps concern should be replaced with velvet bitchslap. Yet in another post about the original post..... >>"I just stated my opinion about the general direction of the market, no announcements made......My points were specifically about options trades of the nature I described, so I don't think we're in too much disagreement there. <g>"<< Hmmm... selective memory? there were some pretty disconcerting announcements made, no? They weren't specifically about options trades, no? If they weren't points she made what were they? If they weren't announcements or points made, then why were those very disconcerting comments included? Ö¿Ö Tim@somethingisamiss.com