Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Troppmann who wrote (34840)	11/14/2000 7:13:27 AM
From: Frederick Smart	Respond to of 42771

Don..... >>Or hadn't you noticed that at about the same time as Novell's enlightened minions decided they didn't give a shit about what the shareholders had to say most of the shareholders didn't give a shit about anything Novell had to say.>> BINGO!!

To: Don Troppmann who wrote (34840)	11/15/2000 4:58:19 PM
From: kilo_watt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42771

Of course, I shouldn't respond to this posting... but doesn't it seem like you ought to try your own medicine Don? "Your comments about Novell's decision related to the Boy Scouts is as sick as their apparently devolving corporate culture. While you continue to hide behind your ex-officio status as the ultimate insider try to keep your personally intolerant comments to yourself." Who's being intolerant here? And, don't you see the irony of your comments? You calling my statement about not supporting intolerance to be intolerant itself??? I'm not hiding behind any status (and your use of the phrase ex officio is just plain wrong); and I'm not the ultimate insider, nor have I claimed to be. I don't even work for the damned company anymore, Don. I still stand behind my comments, and I stand behind Novell's policy not to support organizations that discriminate. Don, your comment is clearly the result of blind fury. You can't even keep it together enough to create a paragraph that makes sense. You attack me personally because you disagree with one thing I've said, a position I stand for. I'm sorry if you can't support openness and tolerance. I can't understand why that makes you so angry. My guess is that you're a died-in-the-wool Republican. You act like one. If I were Fred, I'd proactively forgive you :) I'm not Fred. If you can't engage in civil discourse, why bother at all? Flaming me is pretty pointless and just makes you look like a knee-jerk reactionary. -k_w- "The Ultimate Insider"