Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: edward miller who wrote (35168)	11/14/2000 9:52:36 AM
From: Juli	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50167

OT Actually, I voted for Nader as well. I think both parties have reached a point where they cannot put forward a strong candidate for fear of losing the special interest money. I would think that a recount would be more fair than the one that has taken place. Both Republicans and Democrats will be watching carefully. I think there will be less mischief than there has been in the machine count. It is obvious that the machine counts were off quite a bit in Bush's favor. This will leave his image tainted, in my opinion. Of course, I think his real image is already tainted. It is just that they painted him up to look like something that he is not because they thought he could win. It is a shame that Liddy Dole was head and shoulders above Bush and yet she couldn't raise enough money to mount a viable campaign.