Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (6025)	11/14/2000 8:14:52 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

there is no need for a recount......see? This is not about having a "perfect" vote. It is about having a fair vote... And a double electronic recount is quite fair. And the fact that the democratic election supervisor ROBBED her district by choosing a confusing butterfly ballot (that most 7 year olds can figure out) is not the fault of the American people. People are now finally coming to the correct opinion of "If they recounted them over again electronically (twice) and it STILL didn't make a difference in who won... then let the results stand and await the absentee ballots. There is simply NO REASON that Palm Beach voters should be treated any differently that the rest of the American voting public were. And Americans know that if PB gets their way and obtains a manual recount, then every ballot box in the nation should be recounted... Certainly out of 100,000 million votes cast, the odds are good that 150,000 votes could change hands and result in Bush having a popular vote majority as well...