SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (37750)11/14/2000 1:45:42 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
I'm afraid you and I don't agree on much of anything lately, JDN. Except maybe that buying and holding SUNW for the long term seems like a pretty good idea. Maybe once it warms up and I try that car wax we can agree on it, too.

JMHO.

Charles Tutt (TM)



To: JDN who wrote (37750)11/14/2000 1:47:20 PM
From: techtonicbull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
McNealy has said he is for Bush but Why is Bush good for SUNW? I thought I heard that he would be against the break-up of MSFT!



To: JDN who wrote (37750)11/14/2000 2:08:25 PM
From: JC Jaros  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Bush, THE GREAT URETER says that when we disagree we should
search deeper for something we CAN agree on.


And that would involve a Federal judge? Help me out. At
what point do you find George W. to be completely phony?
I'd bet if the whole thing (election) were held over, Bush
would be a much less ambiguous second place finisher.

With regard to 'arguing about dimples' and 'saying
something about the man' -- Umm, it's not like the fellow
(Gore) arbitrarily decided to ask for a re-count.
Apparently JDN style partisanship permiates Florida
politics down to the vote tabulation level.

Gore made the phone call (concession) before he found out
about fraud. If Bush ends up as President, I feel it won't
be the last time we hear the word 'fraud' associated with
'Bush'.
-JCJ