SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: porn_start878 who wrote (19044)11/14/2000 4:37:47 PM
From: andreas_wonischRespond to of 275872
 
Max, thanks for the comparison Athlon numbers. It's pretty clear that P4 is an unperformer on non-bandwith dependent and non-SSE applications.

Andreas



To: porn_start878 who wrote (19044)11/14/2000 7:32:08 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (4) | Respond to of 275872
 
P4 scales horribly - thanks to Max for the excellent benchmark comparison. I noticed how little gain the P4 gets when going from 1.4 to 1.5 GHz. Although you might expect this from disk-bound benchmarks like Sysmark, I suspect that memory latency is a big factor as GHz goes higher, because Quake 3 only gets 40% of the theoretical improvement based on clock speed.

In the table below, I define the scalability index as the percentage of the theoretical increase actually realized as clock speed is raised from 1.4 to 1.5. (7.14%) In other words, if a benchmark runs 3.57% faster, there would be a 50% entry at that benchmark.

Benchmark PIV-1400 PIV-1500 Scalability Index
Content Creation Winstone2000 58.8 60.2 35%
Quake III – demo2 200.8 206.5 40%
SYSmark J - 2013 2073 42%
SPECfp2000 541 562 54%
SYSmark 200 208 56%
3D WinBench 2000 processor test 2.44 2.55 63%
3DMark 2000 CPU speed test 434 457 74%

Petz



To: porn_start878 who wrote (19044)11/15/2000 2:00:26 AM
From: milo_moraiRespond to of 275872
 
Comparisons to a TB 1.2/266DDR to PIII-1000 PIV-1400 PIV-1500


PIII-1000 PIV-1400 PIV-1500 T-Bird

Quake III – demo2 143.2 200.8 206.5 TB: 176
SYSmark J 1853 2013 2073 TB: 1916(W2k)
and 2086
(Win Me)

amd.com

SYSmark 200 200 208 TB : 245!!!

Content Creation
Winstone2000 53.5 58.8 60.2 TB: 63.5

SPECfp2000 314 541 562 TB : 370

anandtech.com

3D WinBench 2000
processor test 1.93 2.44 2.55 TB: 2.17

3DMark 2000
CPU speed test 393 434 457 TB: 434

sharkyextreme.com


Max

NOTE : the system configuration may differ but each one uses about the TOP of what is available...

Message 14807036

I reformated for clarity.
Milo