Kilo.....
>>Fred, I'm as technically savvy as anyone on the board and further am actively "in deep" in terms of new technologies on the internet. I talk to CEOs of startups every week about stuff that the market hasn't even seen.
And yet, I cannot personally make even the slightest amount of sense of what you're saying. I get the impression that you have a concept but that you yourself cannot actually understand how that concept might work and therefore can't explain it clearly.>>
I'm glad to hear this. And since you are confused, there's a lot of good that can come from this interaction.
>>This section is particularly unclear:
"The net already slices and dices your data into little IP bits and pieces. "
--Ok, so this is wrong thinking. The TCP/IP protocol specifies individually identifiable data packets which get routed through an internetwork to their destination. The "Net" doesn't actually do anything active here.
"The solution to this is quite simple: after slicing and dicing you just add a third dimension - ie. destination, location, storage address - to the packet. Hundreds, thousands and millions of these new destinations can be added after passing through the original object, filter destination, etc. "
--The solution? There's not a problem per se. Further slicing and dicing are not dimensions one and two. If you're talking about adding more information to the packet header you're barking up the wrong tree. The second sentence in this paragraph truly makes no sense whatsoever. Which new destinations? Which original object? Millions of new destination are added after passing through the original filter?? If I didn't know better, I'd swear you were a Scientologist trained in the fine art of doublespeak.>>
Kilobrother. I am simply sharing an idea. Relax.
If you aren't open to sharing and interacting with what I share in a positive light, then that's fine, too.
This is what part of these boards are for. Writing and sharing and supporting. And from time to time we have get issues and positions which we proclaim, etc.
But back to the idea - I'm simply outlining a "from one to many and back again" storage/retrieve paradigm that I believe has more privacy and security.
The "many" bites and bites of the original data get stored in disparate areas of the net.
When I click my mouse or finger or speak something with my voice all these many, many pieces majically reassemble.
Is that simple enough for you?
>>"There's a way of optimizing this approach to actually relieve net congestion/traffic. Bottom line, when the slicing, dicing and compression is done, the theory is that you only need 20% of the original fragmented data to restore/retrieve what your requesting."
--Optimizing which approach? The approach to relieving net congestion? The approach of adding a "third dimension"? Where did compression come from? You can't compress an IP packet. Further, the IP packet is something like 40% overhead to start with. Finally, you need at least 66% of "fragmented" information to rebuild the remaining 33%. Again, this last sentence is filled with such a huge lack of specificity as to make it virtually incomprehensible.>>
Relax, relax Kilo. Don't have a heart attack over what I write. Please, please. Calm down buddy.
I'm sure your/our engineering friends can comment on this much better than you or I. Nothing to lose sleep over.
>>"Again, look at it this way. Current net/storage/directories assume only two legs: 1) the leg requesting data/service and 2) the leg sending data/service. "
--I assume you are speaking of the basic architecture of the internet? Cause I'm not sure what you're talking about. Net/storage/directories? Which is it? On the internet the reality is that there is not a two-way virtual circuit. Nothing on the internet "requests". Everything is a one-way push out to the internet. It's a sort of fire-and-forget for packets. Perhaps this is not what you are talking about though. I'm not sure.>>
Yes. Fire and forget. And I see XML providing an additional level of targeted intelligence to find/locate/update/transfer data in realtime, but much of this of two-way "fire and forget". The intelligence has to be in the dispersal and re-assembly at the control point where the individual is located.
>>"I'd argue that the net is about validating the primacy of a theorectical 3rd leg - call this agency, service, risk or value-added leg. This is where these virtual proxies, objects and filters come into play. "
--Getting off the deep end here, Fred. You would argue that the net is about validating the primacy of a theoretical 3rd leg? So where did this 3rd leg come from? Is this related to the 3rd dimension of a sliced and diced IP packet? C'mon Fred.. admit, you are speaking right out of your ass here. You don't actually know what you're talking about.>>
This third leg currently really doesn't exist today. It's me vs. the company's site I'm going to or getting something from.
I'm referring to intelligent proxies for my personal interests that are live, secure and virtually update in realtime to gather, filter, weigh and transmit on to me the pieces of data/information/output which optimizes and leverages my personal experience as well as the experience and interaction of those who want to help and serve me.
For example, this posting medium lacks depth and dimension of voice, color, quality, etc. Depending on the person ineracting with what I share what I share can be taken many different ways - positive and negative.
>>"This leg adds a vertical dimension that creates more "freedom" and energy while ensuring more privacy/security. My guess is that the net would sing and get a whole lot more efficient. Perhaps I2 will open some of these new doord. Bi-directional control systems are negated by the simple introduction of this third leg. Fragmented, intelligent storage will be actually more private and secure then current systems. "
See you never explained where the 3rd leg came from and how it relates to anything, so how I can ever make the connection about how whatever it is creates more freedom and energy. I think what you are talking about is some sort of like... certificate authority as a constant intermediary.>>
In the trading division of the financial services industry we refer to these third legs as "smart routers." Certain conditions have to be met before a trade is routed to a certain destination, etc. That's about the simplest example.
>>Fred, really you need to 1) come up with some credibility and 2) start speaking English. You're not nearly the most technical, the most business savvy, or the most "internet aware" person on this board, so don't try to pull the wool over anyone's eyes.>>
Kilo, thank you for responding. I hope with time you can continue to share more positive things on this board on this and other subjects. We all learn from each other.
One last comment: I'm surprised at the biting negative tone. Is this what makes you a success in life? Perhaps you could share with us what your definition of success is? Fun, happiness, forgiveness, light, energy, hope and love are words I like to keep close to me heart. These virtues define success in my life.
>>Pretend I'm a venture guy and you're pitching to me. I want two things: 1) Your 5-word description of your concept ("We're the Ariba of lithography" for instance) and 2) Your elevator pitch.>>
Here's my 5 WORD description:
THE WORLD COMES TO ME.
Here's my elevator pitch:
Singing the full redition of "Take me out to the ballgame."
Hows that Kilo!!
Why don't you throw out that credibility meter of yours.
The world may look pretty wacky and scarey. All those people trying to pull wool over so many eye! Yikes!!! But I guarantee you will break through several layers of your comfort zones.
This is what Novell and all of us need to do more of. Stepping out, risking and breaking through conventional boundaries more.
These zappy judgmental vibes and barbs eventually have to go. They really do nothing but exacerbate the separation between individuals. And people get tired posturing and wearing peacock feathers all the time.
Cut through the BS. Let GO!! Risk, be tolerant and practice really living and loving.
Sorry for this fluffiness. For some reason it seems to absolutety drives some folks crazy.
Peace.
GO!! |
