SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Selectric II who wrote (16137)11/14/2000 4:08:22 PM
From: abstract  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
You are correct. That is not the point. The point is that it gives the Democrats the ability to go to court, to have another hearing, to give it another shot. I keep expecting to hear from Clarence Darrow.



To: Selectric II who wrote (16137)11/14/2000 4:13:01 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
exactly, no shortage of cause to reject hand recounts
"they are subjective in nature, with criterion being an unapproved standard"

that standard evolved without any state supervision
what a well-intentioned biased joke

how about
"they are not uniformly applied across all precincts in all counties"

Democrats dont know it yet, but THEY ARE OUTSIDE LOOKING IN

/ JW


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News