Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (74613)	11/14/2000 3:57:47 PM
From: jraz1	Respond to of 769667

PT with the best and most insightful posts on the subject.

To: PartyTime who wrote (74613)	11/14/2000 4:03:08 PM
From: U Up U Down	Respond to of 769667

In a follow-up interview with The Californian, Dooley said, "I think he ought to acknowledge that he in part was responsible — if Gore loses — for putting this country in a position where the Supreme Court is going to inevitably become much more conservative and could potentially jeopardize a woman's right of choice and a whole host of other issues." That could come about, he said, if Bush appoints anti-abortion, social conservatives to the court. Nader could not be reached for comment, but Roll Call's Heard on the Hill political gossip column quoted him as laying any blame for a Gore loss on Gore himself. "The premise of everything (Dooley's) saying is the impudent suggestion that if Gore loses, I caused him to lose," Nader said. "But there are many streams that are flowing into this river. He (Gore) couldn't even get his own state, Tennessee ... If Gore can't beat the bumbling governor from Texas, I'm not going to take the blame bakersfield.com <g>