Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Reuben who wrote (277)	11/14/2000 5:01:10 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 405

LOL! Set up for failure. Now, if had started the thread when CSCO was at $80 ... or even $70 he would have looked good. Instead he starts the thread when CSCO is sub $50. LOL! Saaawweeeet!!! OG

To: Paul Reuben who wrote (277)	11/14/2000 9:27:15 PM
From: chitral	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 405

"Lastly, stupid posts are to be insulted."--Last line from CSCOs where's the bottom subject Comments like this do not lead to good debates. To me, debating the issues surrounding a company is what SI is all about. Listening to perma bulls and perma bears scream at each other is worthless in understanding the marked direction of a company such as CSCO. For the last eight months the bears have been mostly right, prior to that the bulls have been right. I like it when both sides point out facts that contribute to the growth or decline of companies or their stock values. As they say two heads are better than one. The insights and opinions of others allows me to see changes in a company that I might not recognize on my own. For that I am grateful. No matter what the stock price is now. Tomorrow it may go up or it may go down. I like to hear arguments for both, based on reasonable assessments of the given data. Even LTB&H investors should pay attention to near term changes, for they may indicate fundamental changes in a company. Back to CSCO. I used to be a strong bull. However, CSCO does not seem to have the umph that it once had. Is this due to the market being in a rut, or is there some fundamental change in CSCO? So far I am undecided. I am still trying to asses the long term affects of CSCO many buying sprees. In the past they have been a major part in CSCOs success. But these acquisitions seem to becoming less important in the over all operation of CSCO. Chitral p.s. I hope Bambs enjoys his new found freedom.