Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nick who wrote (16379)	11/15/2000 9:25:02 AM
From: bvinnieb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

The reason the votes changed, was due to a number of reasons. For one they ballots are difficult to read and since the democrats are supervising the process it is turned in their favor. Have you seen the people trying to understand what is what,that in and off itself shows they do not have a glue unless someone can guide them in a certain direction. IMHO Vinnie

To: Nick who wrote (16379)	11/15/2000 9:33:42 AM
From: Selectric II	Respond to of 65232

Florida law permits a manual recount, not a Karnac-the-magician reclassification, cooked up in an ad-hoc, ex-post-facto fashion by local Democrat canvassing boards to favor their candidate. It's possible that the statutory scheme doesn't meet the Constitutional muster of equal protection and due process for the other 6,000,000 Floridians or the other 100,000,000 voters who actually followed instructions and "voted." Gore might be found to have cooked up those 1,400 votes, because the method used to manufacture them wasn't applied across-the-board, and we don't know what standard was used, or whether it was uniformly applied even within PB County.