Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (6167)	11/15/2000 1:11:38 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

My guess, whether it's true or not depends on your point of view. It IS the central matter of Bush's Federal Case, IMO. That is, a state-wide hand-count or the current machine count are clearly the only fair options. Al Gore sought a clearly unfair option from the start, even while claiming it's fair over and over. Maybe now he'll get a statewide chad count, or maybe he'll get his chosen additions included unbalanced. Yuk! He doesn't deserve poopy right now, IMO. I still think the final court handling this would have to agree, then choose one option or the other, and possibly a few re-count conditions, or a stern recommendation to upgrade systems countrywide else face judicial wrath, or something. ;-) I think this is the real argument Bush is hanging his hat on, attendant parts are just that and little more. Freedom Works, Dan B