Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (117907)	11/15/2000 12:43:07 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"Almost everyone is a member of a political party and has a bias. The problem with the SOS is that she is a key figure in Bush's campaign, and is looking for a position in the Bush Administration." But you would be satisfied if the SOS just handed over everything to a Democrat wouldn't you? <G> Jim

To: Scumbria who wrote (117907)	11/15/2000 12:46:45 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 186894

Scumbria: Who has the more dangerous conflict. The person who "remote views" the vote, or the person you wish to have carte blanche accept that determination. Duke

To: Scumbria who wrote (117907)	11/15/2000 12:50:12 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, re:"Almost everyone is a member of a political party and has a bias. The problem with the SOS is that she is a key figure in Bush's campaign, and is looking for a position in the Bush Administration. This is a serious conflict of interest." Almost everyone is a member of a political party and has a bias. The problem with Al Gore is that he is a key figure in Gore's campaign, and already HAS a position in the current democratic administration. This is a serious conflict of interest. I think he should excuse himself. steve