SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knight who wrote (6190)11/15/2000 5:16:41 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10042
 
Dear Knight: WOW, that is something. I understand it perfectly though. If you line up all the ballots neatly then run a smooth sharp wire ONLY through the GORE hole, IF someone voted for Gore, no double count cause hole would already be there, however if one voted for Buchanon or Bush it would create a DOUBLE COUNT and Viola that ballot gets discarded. INCREDIBLE. I doubt anything is going to be done about it though. JDN



To: Knight who wrote (6190)11/16/2000 12:32:30 PM
From: George Coyne  Respond to of 10042
 
Knight, I read the first article completely and believe it makes a great deal of sense. To be sure, it is only statistical and circumstantial evidence, but it is very strong. The way to determine one way or the other is to examine the double-punched presidential ballots. If the thesis is correct, some 15,000 of the 19,000 double-punched (in the presidential race) will be Gore, Bush double punches. Good find. I have relayed to several Florida papers.

G. W.



To: Knight who wrote (6190)11/16/2000 1:08:38 PM
From: AmericanVoter  Respond to of 10042
 
Thank you for the post and links... very informative... eom



To: Knight who wrote (6190)11/16/2000 2:52:19 PM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 10042
 
Thanks, many parts of that came clear to me, but this part seems to be one simple, key, statement easily understandable.

"Democratic officials in Palm Beach County have not been able to explain why 15,000 ballots
were double-punched in 1996 AND in 2000. The "butterfly ballots were NOT used in the
previous Presidential election. Thus, there is a pattern not of massive error by the voters, but
of continued fraud by the Democratic election committee members and local officials. Further
indication of deliberate fraud is that there is no evidence of previous massive "voter error" in
Democratic primaries, Democratic runoff's, or Congressional races the past years."

reagan.com

Dan B