Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (76448)	11/15/2000 6:19:48 PM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The Florida statutes do not provide for interpretation of indentations in ballots. LoF

To: TigerPaw who wrote (76448)	11/15/2000 6:56:02 PM
From: James R. Barrett	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

How about "just count the friggin votes as called for in Florida statutes." What's wrong with that law? They are not counting votes, they are "interpreting voter intent" on invalid ballots. If the courts declared that PB county could hand recount all VALID ballots and the new total would be certified and accepted by Ms. Harris, the Dems would still cry foul. They are certain that Gore's victory lies buried in a pile of INVALID ballots. Like I said, it's not about counting, it's about invalid ballots. The Dems feel that voter errors and voter stupidity should be corrected after the election is over as long as they are certain that the errors were made by mentally challenged democrats.