Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (3298)	11/15/2000 6:44:56 PM
From: DanZ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5582

Here's another case that is irrelevant to GUMM. It was on the same page as the note you posted about Schneider. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp. (CRD #7560, Jersey City, New Jersey) submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent in which the firm was censured and fined $10,000. Without admitting or denying the allegations, the firm consented to the described sanctions and to the entry of findings that it engaged in a pattern or practice of late trade reporting in that it failed to report to the Fixed Income Pricing System (FIPS) transactions in FIPS securities within five minutes after execution. (NASD Case #CMS000196) Like I said before Floyd, nearly every market maker has been fined by the NASD. Look around and you'll find that GSCO, MLCO, PRUS, etc have also been fined recently. The fine against Schneider has no relevance to GUMM. Should one avoid buying any stock that DLJ trades? Considering the usefulness of your research, it would appear that your time isn't worth much. Oh, and Auric. Libel per se is very easy to prove. You claim fraud. You can't prove fraud. You are guilty of libel per se. It's that simple. I'm sure someone like you with recent legal problems has an attorney handy. Why don't you ask him. BTW, did you figure out how to turn your calculator on yet?